Interview and Narrative by
Jessica Roemischer
I think I’m beginning to see
people as colors! Having just immersed myself for the past three months in
Spiral Dynamics—an incisive and far-reaching theory of human development—I
can say without exaggeration that Spiral Dynamics is, indeed, one of the major
breakthroughs in mapping and managing complexity—that complexity being us. Our
diverse worldviews, our beliefs, our very identities, represented by eight
"memes," or value systems, which apply as much to individuals as to
entire cultures. And, as I am discovering, this dynamic spiral-shaped model of
human consciousness, with its hierarchy of color-coded memes, is literally
coloring my perception.
I was at a friend’s wedding
and suddenly realized that I was seeing the BLUE (absolutist) meme in the
conservatively-dressed woman wearing a crucifix, the ORANGE (achievist) meme in
the young go-getter with the Rolex, the GREEN (egalitarian) meme in the aging
bearded hippie. And not only that—I’m beginning to see just how
"GREEN" I am, with my longing for communal living and acceptance, my
strong bias against corporations and political conservatives, and my passion for
environmental causes, even though I am, admittedly, attached to driving my Audi
(ORANGE), fast (RED—impulsive)!
Should I be worried? Am I
typecasting other people, and myself, with these apparently broad-brushed,
color-coded characterizations called "memes"? Is the Spiral Dynamics
model, comprised of these memes, simply a convenient way to avoid having to
grapple with the complexity and diversity of human beings and the challenge to
discern who we really are? On the contrary, I have been finding that, rather
than a cold analytical detachment or one-dimensional perspective, Spiral
Dynamics is giving rise to a profound clarity of insight into the sweeping
patterns of human psychologies, beliefs, and values (including my own) that are,
often unconsciously, guiding our choices and shaping our very identities. Spiral
Dynamics is also resulting in an unexpected and liberating objectivity because
it places my own experience in the context of the entire history of human
psychological development, the totality of which is present in each of us—from
the most primitive survivalist instincts (BEIGE) to evolved spiritual
aspirations (TURQUOISE), with, in my case, a good dose of righteous
eco-egalitarianism (GREEN) thrown in!
But why a spiral, you might
ask? Spirals are a dynamic expression of natural and cosmic forces, a
"dominant universal fractal" evident in everything from our DNA code
to the spiraling galaxies that inhabit the universe. Spiral Dynamics posits that
the evolution of human consciousness can best be represented in this way: by a
dynamic, upward spiraling structure that charts our evolving thinking systems as
they arc higher and higher through levels of increasing complexity. Certainly,
human consciousness has dramatically increased in complexity over the span of
millennia, as evidenced by our fast-paced highly interactive world. But, despite
any illusions I may have about how far up the spiral I am in my technology-rich
postmodern life, according to Spiral Dynamics, we human beings are only just
emerging from the first great episode of human history—a 100,000-year epoch
defined fundamentally by survivalism: the Spiral’s "First Tier."
Dr. Don E. Beck has been
developing, teaching, and implementing Spiral Dynamics for nearly three decades.
Transmitting the genuinely inclusive or "integral" perspective that is
the essence of the Spiral Dynamics model, Beck portrays the vast tapestry of
global cultures with the care, insight, and easy familiarity with which one
might speak about the members of one’s extended family, each with their unique
capacities and challenges. And this evolved humanitarianism conveys Beck’s
passionate and sincere conviction that Spiral Dynamics can resolve the immense
challenges and responsibilities we face at this juncture in history.
Indeed, one could call Don Beck
a philosopher-activist for the new millennium. As cofounder of the National
Values Center in Denton, Texas, and President and CEO of the Spiral
Dynamics Group, Inc., a global enterprise, he is, by his own definition, a
"Spiral Wizard," employing the Spiral Dynamics model to effect
large-scale systems change in and among various sectors and societies of the
world. Together with Christopher Cowan, he wrote Spiral
Dynamics: Mastering Values, Leadership, and Change in 1996, which is
based on and enhances the groundbreaking "Value Systems" theory of
human development proposed by the late Professor Clare Graves. Beck’s long
consulting career has taken him to such diverse settings as 10 Downing Street,
to meet with members of Tony Blair’s Policy Unit; inner-city Chicago, to
address the difficulties faced by educational institutions there; the World
Bank, to address the future of Afghanistan; and the boardrooms of major banks,
energy companies, airlines, and government agencies.
Don Beck has discussed racial
issues with President Bill Clinton and deep reconciliation strategies with
President Nelson Mandela, playing a central role in the peaceful creation of a
democratic South Africa, for which he received a legislative honor in 1996 in
his home state of Texas. More recently, he has joined forces with integral
philosopher Ken Wilber and
President of the Arlington
Institute John Petersen,
among others, to make Spiral Dynamics an even more powerful tool "for
managing large-scale interventions, change, and transformation"—a new
initiative called "Spiral Dynamics integral" (SDi).
Drawing from his vast
experience, Dr. Beck illustrates why Spiral Dynamics is invaluable for anyone
who sincerely recognizes the necessity for human transformation and global
reconciliation at this critical and all-demanding period in history. And indeed,
as one becomes familiar with Spiral Dynamics, it easily becomes apparent why
this compelling theory is called nothing less than "a new definition of
human nature [and of the] evolutionary significance of human intelligence."
Spiral Dynamics
WIE: Dr.
Beck, can you begin by explaining the basic concept of Spiral Dynamics?
DON BECK: The
concept of Spiral Dynamics is that human nature is not fixed; we’re not set at
birth. Rather, we have the capacities, in the nature of the mind/brain itself,
to construct new conceptual worlds. So what we’re trying to describe is simply
how humans are able, when things get bad enough, to adapt to their situation by
creating greater complexities of thinking to handle new problems.
WIE: Can
you elaborate on what seems to be our unique capacity to develop higher levels
of thinking and cognition?
DB: Spiral
Dynamics is based on the assumption that we have adaptive intelligences,
"complex, adaptive, contextual intelligences," which develop in
response to our life circumstances and challenges—what Spiral Dynamics calls Life
Conditions. What we’re always focusing on are the causative dynamics
created by the Life Conditions and then the kinds of coping mechanisms and
collective intelligences that are forged in response to those conditions. These
collective intelligences are what we call memes.*
WIE: You
seem to be pointing to the evolutionary nature of human intelligence, which
makes it possible for us to adapt to and survive our existential challenges, or
"Life Conditions." Can you speak further about the evolutionary
significance of "memes"?
DB: Like
genes, viruses, and bacteria, memes respond to the same basic principle in the
universe, which is this concept of renewal, this regenerating capacity. Each
successive meme contains a more expansive horizon, a more complex organizing
principle, with newly calibrated priorities, mindsets, and specific bottom
lines. It’s a way of solving problems. It’s a way of assigning priorities to
what’s most important and why, formed in response to the Life Conditions. And
just like a biological DNA code, which is a code that replicates itself
throughout the body, a meme code is a bio-psycho-social-spiritual DNA-type
script, a blueprint that spreads throughout a culture, and plays out in all
areas of cultural expression, forming survival codes, myths of origin, artistic
forms, lifestyles, and senses of community.
WIE: So,
you are saying that as humans adapt to their Life Conditions, this awakens new
intelligences, or meme codes, which in turn shape the evolution of culture.
DB: Yes.
And cultures, as well as countries, are formed by the emergence of these memes,
or value systems, which are the glue that bonds a group together, defining who
they are as a people and reflecting the place they inhabit on the planet.
My longtime friend and
colleague, the late Professor Clare Graves, sensed that there were deeper
patterns in the evolution of human consciousness and identified eight levels of
psychological and cultural existence, or value systems, which became the basis
for the spiral model. The same principles or levels of existence apply as much
to a single person as to an entire society. Graves involved thousands of people
in his research and was constantly on the lookout for these deeper patterns,
which, he argued, reflect different activation levels of our dynamic
neurological equipment.
WIE: Could
you outline the spiral model with its hierarchy of eight memes, or levels of
existence?
DB: In
the language of Graves, the spiral’s "First Tier" is a set of six
memes characterized by existence or subsistence. What that means
is that we’re more like animals than like gods and we have to deal with what
are essentially earthbound existence problems. So the First Tier (BEIGE, PURPLE,
RED, BLUE, ORANGE, GREEN) clusters together our "subsistence" or
survival-level concerns, while the Second Tier (YELLOW, TURQUOISE) works to
create healthy forms of all the First Tier systems in the context of an
information-rich, highly mobile global community. While Graves identified eight
levels of existence, with a ninth on the horizon, the Spiral is expansive,
open-ended, continuous, and dynamic. There is no final state, no ultimate
destination, no utopian paradise. It’s a never-ending upward quest, with each
stage but a prelude to the next, and the next, and the next.
WIE: And
what drives the evolutionary emergence of these stages, or memes, up the spiral?
DB: Our
crises, because they provide the inflection points and the benchmarks that
trigger the shift up to the next level of human development. And each level of
existence, or meme, is more like an emerging wave, a fluid living system, than a
rigid hierarchical step. Once a new level appears in a culture, all of the
previously acquired developmental stages remain in the composite value system.
In Ken Wilber’s language, each new social stage "transcends but
includes" all of those that have come before. For this reason, the more
complex thinking systems have greater degrees of freedom.
WIE: Why
do you use a spiral model to chart the emergence of these evolutionary stages of
psychological and cultural development?
DB: A
spiral vortex best depicts the emergence of human systems, or memes, as they
evolve through levels of increasing complexity. Each upward turn of the spiral
marks the awakening of a more elaborate version on top of what already exists,
with each meme a product of its times and conditions. And these memes form
spirals of increasing complexity that exist within a person, a family, an
organization, a culture, or a society. We all live in flow states; there is
always new wine, always old wineskins. And you can see that this whole
evolutionary process is working because we’re still here, because we’ve been
able to survive thousands and thousands of years of coping with what has been
quite a hostile environment. So we have a wonderful species that has an innate
capacity to renew itself. That’s what makes us human.
Until recently, I’ve been too caught up with
the technological satisfactions and day-to-day demands of my fast-paced life to
even consider what it’s taken for evolution to produce, well, me! But thanks
to the Spiral Dynamics model, with its evolutionary stages of development, the
memes, it’s starting to sink in: BEIGE instincts, PURPLE mysticism, RED
self-assertion, BLUE conformity, ORANGE materialism, GREEN egalitarianism. . . .
You see, the thing is, I can personally relate to all the memes. And that’s
how Spiral Dynamics makes human evolution real and makes it make sense. Because
the stages of our entire evolutionary history are entirely present in me—a
human being living at the threshold of the new millennium, and coincidentally,
as I’ve discovered, at the threshold of the spiral’s "Second
Tier."
But wait—according to Spiral
Dynamics, all the First Tier memes are fundamentally about survival, no matter
how sophisticated they may look. Could I be in a merely survivalist mode of
living, with my Audi, my cell phone, and my PalmPilot? Well, the fact that I’ve
never really sat down to consider my evolutionary legacy is probably a sign that
"making it through the day" is indeed absorbing most of my attention.
But according to Spiral Dynamics, whether I’m consciously aware of it or not,
the memes—these "complex adaptive contextual intelligences" that
have developed over millennia—are my internal palette, coloring my
perspectives and giving me the benefit of a spectrum of possibilities.
The "Memes"
BEIGE
WIE: The
Spiral Dynamics model charts our evolutionary development beginning 100,000
years ago with the appearance of the first "level of existence," the
BEIGE meme. What defines this first stage of human development?
DB: BEIGE
is a virtually automatic state of existence, driven by the imperative
physiological needs that trigger the very basic survival equipment with which we
are born. In its original form, starting 100,000 years ago, the BEIGE level of
existence was the first step that made us human. It is humans simply struggling
to survive in environments where there are other animals. Yet we are more
sophisticated and seem to have more conceptual skills for bonding into
protective clans to preserve what we have and fend off predators. The father in
the survival clan eats first because if the strongest dies, the family has no
hope. So, the key to BEIGE is survival using instinctive intelligences, with a
more heightened sensory system with which we can see better, hear better—we
can sense things with the hair standing on the back of our neck. Simply staying
alive is more highly valued than anything else.
WIE: Are
there any remaining examples of BEIGE in the world today?
DB: The
only real BEIGE that exists today in its pristine condition is hidden away in
Indonesia and parts of Africa. We’ve studied bushmen for some time, and it’s
quite clear that they have an uncanny ability to recall where the water is
buried, and the ostrich eggs, and can sense weather changes. So we don’t
equate primitive with being primitive and "dumb" because there are
possibly sixteen different senses, including a remote viewing capacity, that are
activated at this level. But today, most of these senses have atrophied and have
been overwhelmed by our more complex conceptual systems.
WIE: Do
Life Conditions sometimes force people to exist at the BEIGE level, even though
they may not actually be primitive or represent the "pristine"
form of this meme?
DB: Oh,
one can find pieces of BEIGE in street people who are basically
hunter-gatherers, who get what they eat where they find it. You can certainly
see it in the horrible conditions of extreme poverty in Somalia or Ethiopia,
where it’s a hand-to-mouth existence. And also, it’s evident in newborn
infants, who eat when they’re hungry. And some people, when exposed to a
catastrophe, may regress to BEIGE. Higher-order priorities suddenly vanish in
the midst of personal tragedy, extreme suffering, or deprivation. There’s a
kind of emptiness, which is certainly fear-driven, because boundaries and
expectations have suddenly dissolved and one is on one’s own footing, living
by one’s own wiles. It’s that feeling that we have when we have to do
something entirely different, something that we’ve never done before and are
not sure that we even can do. I think that after September 11, we saw some
people temporarily go into BEIGE because the crisis put them in a very different
psychological condition.
PURPLE
WIE: The
second level up the spiral is PURPLE. What evolutionary developments
characterize the shift from the primitive existence of BEIGE to this next level
of existence, the PURPLE meme?
DB: PURPLE
is animistic, tribalistic, and mystical. In this world of PURPLE, we tend to
have the first evidence of human bonding—the sense of a kindred spirit, that
"I’m someone because I belong to a certain clan or certain tribe."
During the Ice Age, the world became overpopulated. There were more humans per
acre than there had ever been before. We had clans in the BEIGE system beginning
to bump into other clans, with a sense of competition for niches starting to
appear. Suddenly a clan, which is loosely structured, solidifies into a tribe
of, say, four to five hundred people, so that the previous clan can now survive
in the midst of competition with other clans. So one of the Life Conditions
changes that led to the shift from BEIGE to PURPLE had to do with territoriality
and access to resources.
Now, at the same time, a
mutation occurred to awaken in the brain the first real ability to assign cause
and effect. This was the first sense of the metaphysical. In the BEIGE mind,
events seem to be scattered, each one unto itself, without much predictability.
But, for example, in Africa, if the moon is full and the cow dies, the PURPLE
mind connects the two events, one causing the other. So the awakening of the
metaphysical system, together with the capacity to work more firmly in a team
arrangement, occurred in the transition from the Dawn People (BEIGE) to the
Mystical People (PURPLE), precipitated by the changing Life Conditions that
occurred during the Ice Age, about fifty thousand years ago.
WIE: It
seems that the emergence of the capacity for bonding and working together, would
literally improve one’s chances for survival.
DB: You’re
absolutely right. Literally. And because these stages of existence, or meme
levels, represent bio-psycho-social systems, they indicate the evolutionary
emergence of biological and physical capacities and abilities. For example, we
know that the level of the brain chemical oxytocin, which has various
health-giving benefits, is higher when humans eat in a group. And so eating
together, breaking bread together, feasts of various kinds, all raise the
oxytocin level in the brain and improve survival. Another thing that developed
at this time was whatever it is in the brain that chemically enables the person
to hear inner voices, the voices of spirits. The PURPLE meme is heavily laden
with such so-called right brain tendencies as heightened intuition, emotional
attachments to places and things, and a mystical sense of cause and effect. I
have a well-developed PURPLE sense myself, having spent so much time with the
Zulus in sacred places.
RED
WIE: With
its tribes and rituals, PURPLE seems to have been quite a leap from the
primitive existence of BEIGE. How did the next meme level of the spiral—RED—arise
out of PURPLE, and what are its defining characteristics?
DB: In
the RED zone, we have the first raw, egocentric self. I am somebody.
Beginning approximately ten thousand years ago, what began to cause the change
in Life Conditions that led to RED were not failures, but rather successes. In
PURPLE we had become very successful. We had found food, we had stabilized our
lifestyle, we had conquered what we thought were the dragons in our life.
Everything was smooth, boring. So many of the youth became discontented. They
saw that there was something about their essence that, rather than being
protected, was being contained, limited. Then RED strides forth. Now we have an
elite individual beginning to move away from the bonding element in PURPLE,
which had become overplayed. So what PURPLE produced, through its success, was
the need for strong individuals who ascend to power, who dominate, for example,
in a military environment where we don’t have the time to vote whether or not
to "take yon hill." What begins to spring free is the assertion of raw
self—the renegade, the heretic, the barbarian, the go-it-alone, the
power-self, the hedonist.
WIE: It’s
more difficult to see the positive attributes of the RED meme. PURPLE definitely
seems more appealing to me, with its emphasis on human bonding and the sense of
the metaphysical.
DB: There
are both positive and negative expressions to all the memes, including RED. In
RED, we see high crime rates, we see all kinds of rage and rebellion, but we may
also see wonderful spurts of creativity, heroic acts, and the ability to break
from tradition and chart a whole new pathway. And RED rebellion and
impulsiveness could only happen because PURPLE, through bonding, stabilized
things. And also, RED was a rebellion against the rituals and sacrifices forced
on the youth by the PURPLE system, in painful rites of passage, for example. So
that’s why RED follows PURPLE, and why PURPLE set the stage for RED.
This is very important—I
want you to see the interconnection. Memes are not free-floating entities. RED
is not better than PURPLE. It’s different. So you have to ask, first and
foremost, what are the Life Conditions? If the Life Conditions require you to be
strong and self-assertive, or to fight your way out of a horrible situation,
then the RED meme is the way to be. RED is not an aberration, but a normal part
of the human meme repertoire. This perspective is fundamental to Spiral
Dynamics: you accept that the memes do not represent a hierarchy of
"better," but rather that each can be expressed in a positive and
negative way, and that the whole spiral with its assortment of meme codes is
inside the person and may be called upon in response to the demands of their
changing Life Conditions.
BLUE
WIE: And
now to the fourth meme level of the spiral. Could you begin by speaking about
the Life Conditions problems produced by RED individualism and egocentrism,
which ultimately required a shift up to the next level, BLUE?
DB: In
BLUE there is a search for a transcendent purpose, a recognition of the
importance of order and meaning, a universe controlled by a single higher power.
Society could no longer function with the constant presence of RED, with its
war-like, gang-like, warlord-like entities, so we have to grow up, to solve the
problems created by RED success. Here for the first time is the capacity to feel
guilt (RED feels shame, but not guilt). In the BLUE system, people gladly accept
authoritarianism and self-sacrifice for the common good.
When BLUE first develops,
it has to handle RED. And that’s why in the Old Testament you have such
punitive measures as "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth." If
there is a heavy RED component, then you have, in religious systems and legal
systems, the very heavy punitive form of BLUE. It’s designed to address the
threat of RED, so as long as the RED threat is there, the punitive expression of
BLUE will continue to exist. But as BLUE moves away from having to contain the
violence in RED, it goes on its life cycle toward its own healthier version,
taking the form of more institutionalized systems, in which righteousness,
discipline, accountability, stability, perseverance, and order prevail.
What also seems to occur in
the brain is a heightened capacity for abstraction, and that abstraction ability
attaches itself to a cause, a cause célèbre, an "ism"—for
example, the Buddhist’s Eightfold Path, or the idea of Islam, which are both
abstractions. So once again, we’re into a metaphysical zone, but this time the
PURPLE spirits are organized into "a mighty fortress is our God . . ."
And thus we have the birth of monotheism and Zoroastrianism and all the
"isms" that suddenly started emerging about five thousand years ago.
And while they had different content, the mode of thinking for all of them was
identical.
WIE: I
had never considered the world’s religions from that point of view, that
despite differences in "content," they are expressions of the same
evolutionary stage of development.
DB: Yes,
because these meme codes are like a blueprint, or like magnets. The meme code we
designate "BLUE" finds a transcendent purpose. What is that
transcendent purpose? It could be Buddhism, or Judaism, or Islam. These
religious expressions are what that meme code has attached to as a way to
express itself. Therefore we can have holy wars between "isms," both
of which are in the BLUE code. Because there’s a difference between the
surface-level manifestations of a core value system, or meme, and the core
system, or meme code, itself.
ORANGE
WIE: How
does institutional, disciplined, absolutist BLUE give rise to the ORANGE meme,
the fifth level of the spiral model?
DB: ORANGE
is about advancement, improvement, and progress. Once again, you play out the
BLUE theme to its ultimate. You make it very, very successful. And then what
happens? The individual gets restless. "But I’m an individual. I want to
assert my personal autonomy." "No," BLUE says. "You must
stay in line and conform to the dictates of the system. Don’t you want to go
to heaven? Don’t you want to have a retirement?" And ORANGE says,
"Yes, but I think I can produce a heaven on earth. I think I can increase
the size of the cake." Thus we had the great Enlightenment, which is simply
the individual spirit breaking free from what had become very restrictive
forces.
Now the BLUE system, when
it first appeared, was relevant, was necessary. But ORANGE individualization
began to appear about three hundred years ago, when the sacred leaders became
too punitive and also became discredited because they could not protect people
from the plagues. And thus we had the birth, thank goodness, of the scientific
method. We also had a growing belief in optimism, in changeability—a belief
that we can indeed shape our future, that we are the stewards of the universe
and therefore have dominion over it. We can carve out a good life for ourselves.
And again, some fascinating things happened in the European brain that seemed to
occur for the first time in the 1700s—the mathematical sense, the sense of
cadence, the linear sense that made possible written music, that made possible
quantification and measurement. These classical left brain capacities uniquely
developed in the Western brain in the ORANGE system. That entire wonderful
movement is begrudgingly classified as "Western," but that’s really
what it is.
WIE: It’s
refreshing to hear you speak about ORANGE in these terms, because I was
reflecting on the many negative effects of this particular meme, for example,
the ecological devastation that ORANGE industrialization has given rise to.
DB: That
is why we have to look at three things: the Life Conditions, the meme code
itself, and the way that meme code is being expressed in a certain context. If
we don’t like capitalism or consumerism, which are expressions of the
ORANGE meme code, it’s not the same thing as the meme code itself, which is
the capacity to engineer things, to make things better. The creativity and
ability to engineer that are inherent in that same ORANGE meme code can now be
used to clean up the environment. That’s why we can’t afford to bash any of
these memetic systems. We can challenge a manifestation of it, but without the
ORANGE thinking system, we couldn’t solve medical problems, we couldn’t
figure out how to clean up the water or the air, and we would sink back to the
myth and mysticism of BLUE. I don’t think anybody wants that to happen.
GREEN
WIE: The
GREEN meme is the final level of the spiral’s First Tier. Can you speak about
the GREEN meme, how it emerged out of ORANGE and the role it plays in human
emergence up the spiral?
DB: At
its peak, GREEN is communitarian, egalitarian, and consensual. Without ORANGE we
wouldn’t have GREEN, because in ORANGE the inner being was bypassed and
ignored. Our science left us numb, without heart and soul, and with only the
outer manifestations of success. The "good life" was measured only in
materialistic terms. We discover that we have become alienated from ourselves,
as well as from others. So GREEN, this fairly recent memetic code, began
emerging about 150 years ago, out of the Ages of Industry, Technology,
Affluence, and Enlightenment, to declare that in all of these undertakings, the
basic human being has been neglected. The focus shifts from personal achievement
to group- and community-oriented goals and objectives—for GREEN, we are all
one human family.
GREEN begins by making
peace with ourselves and then expands to looking at the dissonance and conflicts
in society and wanting to make peace there, too, addressing the economic gaps
and inequities created by ORANGE, and also by BLUE and by RED, to bring peace
and brotherhood so we can all share equally. Gender roles are derigidified,
glass ceilings opened, affirmative action plans are implemented, and social
class distinctions blurred. Spirituality returns as a nondenominational,
nonsectarian "unity."
WIE: And
since GREEN is the final meme level of First Tier, it must be preparing us to
make the transition up to the "Being" levels of the spiral’s Second
Tier.
DB: Yes,
because what GREEN has accomplished, in a very positive sense, is the cleansing
of the spiral, declaring an equality of all the different experiences of life.
It weakens the control of BLUE and ORANGE, allowing the PURPLE and RED
indigenous people to have their place in the sun and their time on CNN. It
works, you see, to find equality and sameness and sensitivity. And it is doing
so for a very good purpose: because without GREEN, we could not go to YELLOW and
Second Tier.
Am I GREEN? Well, am I a good example of
someone who’s environmental, egalitarian, sensitive, spiritual, open-minded,
and culturally aware? You better believe it! Has being GREEN given rise to a
passion for spiritual transformation (YELLOW/TURQUOISE)? Yes. Has my GREENness
also seriously impeded spiritual transformation? Absolutely! It all started with
my very GREEN parents—cultured, intellectual, left-wing types. Both Ph.Ds.
Both teachers. They divorced when I was six. At that time divorce was rare—I
came from the only "broken family" on the block. In fact, both sets of
grandparents—divorced too—were also well ahead of their time. A photograph
of my father in an anti-Vietnam War demonstration appeared on the front page of
the New York Times
in 1970. My first experience of smoking marijuana was with him—he grew it! My
mother always complained bitterly about Republicans (BLUE/ORANGE), as well as
about my father. She worked with young children, many of them disadvantaged. She
was their tireless advocate and railed against the schools that consigned them
to failure.
In my family, there was more
than a fair bit of indulgent, narcissistic behavior (RED) and not a whole lot of
discipline (BLUE). Sometimes, I wistfully imagined growing up with the neighbors—one
particularly close-knit family who were regular church-goers (definitely BLUE).
I longed for some structure and role-modeling, but then quickly felt suffocated
by the thought of it. My musings concluded with choosing the family I had. In
the end, despite the lack of cohesion and, dare I say, character, I somehow
sensed that my family set me on a road of more open-ended possibility. And it
was true. My spiritual journey started young, fueled by my parents’ evolved
appreciation of things cultural, humanitarian, and philosophical. I grew up
reading the theologian Martin Buber, the existentialists Jean- Paul Sartre and
Simone de Beauvoir, the novels of D.H. Lawrence and James Joyce. And now, in my
forties, on the path of transformative spiritual possibility (Second Tier)—thanks
in large part to the early inspiration they gave me—I’m also beginning to
realize that growing up GREEN can have its downside, and that my spiritual path
is strewn with the wreckage of that legacy: narcissism, arrogant individualism,
and a resistance to hierarchy and authority.
But getting back to my family,
now that I think about it, all this GREENness actually started with my
grandmother. On cold rainy days, she would comment: "Jessica, this is Nixon
weather—nasty and rotten!"
The "Mean Green Meme"
WIE: Dr.
Beck, my memetic "center of gravity" is most certainly in GREEN. And I’m
not alone: the GREEN meme is both the leading edge of Western culture at this
time and is for many, like myself, the dominant conceptual and psychological
paradigm. As I have learned, each meme, including GREEN, has both its positive
and negative manifestations. So what I would like to know is how the GREEN meme
is currently creating Life Conditions problems that we must respond to in order
to evolve up the spiral.
DB: As
I said, GREEN is an essential step to YELLOW and Second Tier, but it’s so
expensive—it absorbs rather than contributes.
WIE: Why
do you say that GREEN is expensive?
DB: Because
it is expensive to provide for everyone without requiring some kind of
contribution other than being present for the handout. Most noble "Great
Society" programs have not worked, and those who have tried socialism as
their version of GREEN are finding that that is not the answer either.
WIE: And
what do you mean when you say GREEN "absorbs rather than contributes"?
DB: It
uses the resources that ORANGE has built, but because it dislikes ORANGE, it
backs away from growth. Growth and consumption are bad. It wants to use
resources already available and redistribute them so everybody can catch up.
GREEN is a wonderful system, but ironically, it assumes that everyone enjoys the
same level of affluence that it has.
WIE: I
certainly recognize that in my own experience: my high standard of living allows
me to be very self-satisfied and very egalitarian, all at the same time!
DB: Right.
Only those people who have been successful in ORANGE—who have good bank
accounts, who have some guarantee of survival, who don’t have the wolf at the
door—will begin to think GREEN. But unfortunately, when GREEN starts launching
these attacks on the BLUE and ORANGE meme levels—the nuns with rulers and the
fat cats in corporate suites—it’s like a person who climbs to the top of a
house and then throws down the ladder that got him up there.
WIE: What
effects are we seeing from the negative expression of the GREEN meme?
DB: Unhappily,
what this negative version of GREEN does is to destroy the capacity of ORANGE
and BLUE social and economic systems to actually address the gaps that
GREEN itself has identified. It destroys ORANGE economic structures. And it also
destroys BLUE authoritarian systems, which are necessary to control RED, as we
can see all too clearly in the example of Zimbabwe today. It therefore becomes
counterproductive. It makes things worse. It relieves RED of the responsibility
to learn discipline and purpose in BLUE-ORANGE, because it loves the indigenous
people but tends to read into them greater complexity, as it sees them as
"noble savages." And in destroying the authoritarian, purifying
systems in BLUE and ORANGE, there’s the flooding of the RED undisciplined,
egocentric, impulsive behavior into the GREEN zone, both in one’s self and in
societies. And it is this unhealthy meshing of RED and GREEN, in which strong
egocentric narcissism combines with pontifications about humanity and equality,
that becomes the breeding ground for what Ken Wilber and I call the "Mean
Green Meme," or "boomeritis," so called because the boomer
generation was the first to enter the GREEN meme en masse.
WIE: Ken
Wilber’s book, Boomeritis,
certainly made me realize that I was, indeed, infected with this postmodern
"virus"!
DB: You
see, the whole idea of the "Mean Green Meme" is a rhetorical strategy.
Ken and I asked: How do we uncap GREEN? How do we keep it moving? Because so
much of it has become a stagnant pond, in our view. So we said, let’s invent
the Mean Green Meme. Let’s shame it a bit. Let’s hold up a mirror and show
it what it’s doing, with the hope that it will separate the Mean Green Meme
from legitimate healthy GREEN. Let’s expose enough people to the duplicity and
artificiality and self-serving nature of their own belief systems around
political correctness to finally get the word out that there’s something
beyond that. It is a drastic measure, a rhetorical strategy to create a symbol
that will hopefully give people an understanding that what they are doing is
actually destroying the very thing they want to accomplish.
WIE: What
are the spiritual and psychological implications of the Mean Green Meme?
DB: GREEN
starts with the search for self. "I want to get to know myself. I want to
deal with the hidden child in me. I want to make peace, I want to find
tranquility." So I go into a sensitivity training session, where I get
feedback; I go downward, inward, to look at all my life experiences and try to
remove the guilt. GREEN hates guilt. And it wants to deal with the rage, from
what happened to it, as a victim. But GREEN is a relativistic system. And much
of GREEN is so naïve, thinking, "All people are good people. It’s
society that makes them bad. There are no bad people! There is no evil. That’s
all a myth. Everyone is going to love us." Well, September 11 was a wake-up
call, and for the first time GREEN began to see the ugly face of RED/BLUE. Ever
since that point, a lot more people are becoming interested in the work we are
doing.
My mother was responsible for a not
insignificant number of transcendent moments in my life, mostly associated with
music and dance. She frequently took me to New York’s Lincoln Center for the
Performing Arts, often to see the Russian dancer, Natalia Makarova. Makarova’s
interpretations of the great balletic works were so sublime, so transcendent,
they brought you to tears. In the final moment of a particularly extraordinary
performance of Romeo and Juliet,
the entire audience—perhaps four thousand people—simultaneously rose in one
collective expression of awe. It was nothing less than a spiritual experience.
My mother turned to me and said, "Jess, you are witnessing the greatest
dancing that ever was, and maybe ever will be."
But the legacy of my
unstructured GREEN upbringing is one of contradiction: high aesthetic and
spiritual sensibilities married to the narcissistic need for security and
emotional affirmation. It’s the kind of situation that leaves you at odds with
yourself, and you don’t quite know why. By fourteen or fifteen, the gnawing
hunger that had been floating in my experience for quite some time was
magnetized to something outside myself: guys. Could relationship bring ultimate
fulfillment? I certainly hoped so, and I definitely gave it a good shot—actually,
a lot of shots.
Soon after turning thirty, I
met my first spiritual teacher, a Korean Buddhist monk. One afternoon he said to
me, "Jessica, everything about you is beautiful, except your choice in
men." After a long line of relationships, I couldn’t help but acknowledge
the truth of the second half of that sentence, and the first half really
appealed to me. A powerful yogi, he had unusual healing and intuitive abilities
(PURPLE). "I’m the best health insurance you can have," he reassured
me. "I can cure you of anything." Talk about security. I wanted it!
Plus, I could learn how to meditate and be spiritual too. The perfect
combination. Early one morning, practicing the meditation technique he gave me,
high up in the mountains of South Korea, all my thoughts suddenly dropped away,
and what was left was the unconditional Oneness of everything. As time went on,
he suggested I move to Korea, begin long-term training at his monastery, and
become . . . a nun (BLUE). A nun? Those experiences of Oneness had revealed the
true nature of things. Korea was fascinating and colorful. I was captivated by
this teacher’s unusual abilities and powers. But becoming a nun was quite a
leap. I got cold feet. Was it my unstructured liberal upbringing (GREEN) with
its narcissistic impulses (RED) that made me feel stifled by the prospect of
this lifelong commitment (BLUE), even if it was spiritual? I couldn’t tell,
but one fateful day in Seoul, after much soul-searching, I decided to look
elsewhere for a path to Second Tier.
Life Conditions
WIE: You
said earlier that new intelligences—new meme levels—are
formed in response to our Life Conditions. No one can deny that the Life
Conditions that now confront us as a global human community are more challenging
and dangerous than those of any previous moment in history. Could you speak
about these Life Conditions and the role they play in our next evolutionary
transition?
DB: What
seems to have happened in our lifetime, for good or ill, is that we have learned
the basic codes and principles of life itself. We are confronted with
mind-blowing choices—everything from shaping natural habitats to gene splicing
to using science in various ways to alter the human experience. I don’t think
any of us realize yet what that’s going to mean. So we’re now in this
position: we act like gods. We can change the future, and we have never before
had this capacity as a species. So once again, we find that, not through our
failure but through our success, we are confronted with extremely dangerous
conditions.
And furthermore, power in
the form of nuclear weaponry developed in the more complex ORANGE meme, which
has the stabilizing influence of the previous BLUE code in it, is now under the
control of a RED meme that has no BLUE influence, no discipline and
accountability, no sense of the potential for mutual destruction that emerged in
ORANGE along with that particular technological development. RED has a short
time-frame about power and that’s one hell of a problem. That is, is it not,
one of the primary risks that we face as a species.
WIE: Adding
to this pressure is the fact that life is changing at an ever-increasing rate.
The quote I’m about to read you, by inventor and futurist Ray Kurzweil,
conveys the enormous change that we, as humans, are both precipitating and
simultaneously trying to adapt to:
Centuries ago, people didn’t
think that the world was changing at all. Their grandparents had the same
lives that they did, and they expected their grandchildren would do the
same, and that expectation was largely fulfilled. . . . What’s not fully
understood is that the pace of change is itself accelerating, and the last
20 years are not a good guide for the next 20 years. We’re doubling the
paradigm shift rate, the rate of progress, every decade. This will actually
match the amount of progress we made in the whole 20th century, because we’ve
been accelerating up to this point. The 20th century was like 25 years of
change at today’s rate of change; and the next 25 years we’ll make four
times the progress you saw in the 20th century. And we’ll make 20,000
years of progress in the 21st century, which is almost a thousand times more
technical change than we saw in the 20th century.
DB:
Oh, that’s an awesome quotation. But it assumes that our biological genetic
systems have the complexity of codes in them to support that amount of change
that quickly. There is already beginning to be some doubt in the minds of those
who study our immune system as to whether or not we actually have a capacity to
handle the complexity that’s being demanded of us, even physically. So that
quote presumes an organism that is able to assimilate that amount of change. I
don’t know if that’s the case. I do know that today we are subjected to unbelievable
change because there are billions of people who, from my perspective, are
passing through different layers and levels of the spiral simultaneously. So
rather than our species moving in a singular advance along a horizontal line, it
turns out that multiple changes are happening up and down the spiral. Many are
now moving into zones that we vacated three hundred years ago.
Then you add in other
things, like the impact of the microchip. Furthermore, as we learn more about
ourselves in studies of molecular biology, we are uncovering the so-called
mystery of our genetics. We can do cloning; we can do gene splicing—but what
if we mess it up? What if we release biogenic agents, or bugs, that attack all
carbon life? When we begin to play around with the deepest codes in our biology,
no one can foresee what the flutters of little butterfly wings** in Chaos Theory
will produce down the line. That’s why there’s so much stress on us, which
also means we might be looking for new organizational forms—more ensembles of
people—because no single person is going to be able to keep all these things
in mind.
WIE: Evolutionary
biologist Elisabet
Sahtouris has said that
"stress is the only thing that causes evolution." Is there a
relationship between the increasingly greater levels of stress we are
experiencing in our current Life Conditions and the potential for a significant
percentage of us to evolve up the spiral?
DB:
Well, evolution does take crisis. It does take wake-up calls. But that, in and
of itself, does not guarantee there will be upward movement. If the Huns are at
the gate, literally, for people, or if they’re suddenly under threat of losing
their job because of downsizing or economic collapse, the energy and the
capacity for more complex thinking actually begin to erode, and an earlier, or
lower, priority suddenly dominates.
So in addition to the
crisis, there has to be some stability in the basic memetic systems. And there
has to be the capacity to create new conceptual systems, because just being
exposed to problems may regress the whole society. This is exactly what happened
in Zimbabwe, which was a very richly endowed place. Now there is the virtual
starvation of millions there. That’s why stress in itself is not the key. As
Nobel prize winner Ilya Prigogine would say, when previous systems start to
dissipate, we reach that zone where there will either be an upsurge to a more
complex system or a downshift to a less complex one. It happens in that critical
zone, that tipping point. Though stress crises are certainly necessary to break
out of a memetic paradigm, that in and of itself is no guarantee that we’ll
make the kind of emergence that is necessary. So far, we have.
If there ever was the perfect GREEN existence
that simultaneously answered every First Tier need for security, I had found it
at forty. In the "Green Mountain State" of Vermont, no less,
surrounded by organic farms and neighborly folks! After spending ten months
driving forty thousand miles, literally, all over the state, looking for the
perfect place, my partner and I bought it: a magical, quintessentially
postcard-perfect New England farm, complete with a country farmhouse, barn,
maple sugar house, pond, fields, and 180-degree views of Vermont’s magnificent
mountains. The soil was so fertile that everything in the compost pile took
root. A photograph from the 1940s showed a farmer standing next to the barn with
a fifteen-foot corn stalk. Our plan was to start a small organic farm, to create
a haven for life, including our own. And as if that wasn’t enough—through my
partner’s inheritance, I would never again have financial concerns or have to
worry about making a living. What could be better . . . ?
Well, spiritual transformation—my
own. As the flush of our new farm wore off, I was haunted. In fact, I had been
haunted long before we bought the farm, but had gone ahead with it anyway.
(First Tier dies hard.) I still thought I could find what I was looking for in
personal relationship—a decision ideologically justified by the eco-driven
dream described above. (GREEN and relationship get another chance.) So I raked,
I mowed, I weeded, I tried to find ultimate meaning with my partner, but nothing
seemed to appease this inner restlessness. One afternoon, I drove to Boston to
hear spiritual teacher Andrew
Cohen speak. The haunted,
restless part of myself rejoiced at what was revealed: a higher purpose and
untold possibility. And back at the farm, I became even more unsettled. One
morning, I was standing in the kitchen next to the maple syrup cans and had a
vision: a funnel of pure energy was pulling me headlong into it. I looked out at
the trees. Nothing could be more beautiful than our new farm. But no matter how
pristine was my own small corner of paradise, no matter how wonderful were the
personal Life Conditions I had created for myself, the world was in desperate
shape, and those larger Life Conditions seemed to be generating an undeniable
calling, a higher purpose that was coming from way beyond all my GREEN ideas,
from way beyond my relationship, from way beyond the maple trees, and from way
beyond the mountains. No matter how beautiful this place was—and it sure was
beautiful—it simply wasn’t enough. Having turned forty, my midlife crisis
took the form of an inner imperative: I had to follow this calling, for the sake
of life itself. When, a month later, I decided to leave to pursue spiritual
transformation for real, my dad was surprisingly even-keeled. A seasoned
philosophy professor, he remarked lovingly, "Jess, of all my kids, you’re
the one who makes me glad that I’m a philosopher." An evolved response if
ever I heard one, which made it just that little bit easier to take the leap to
Second Tier.
The Leap to Second Tier
WIE: Your
colleague, the late Clare Graves, had a prophetic sense of the evolutionary
transition we would be called to make. Thirty years ago he said, "Humans
must prepare for a momentous leap. . . . It is not merely a transition to a new
level of existence but the start of a new ‘movement’ in the symphony of
human history." Can you speak about the transformation that is required for
us to survive our current Life Conditions, and evolve to Second Tier?
DB: In
the late 1970s, Graves began to find, in his research and through observations,
thinking patterns that he could not explain. He began to observe, in certain
people he was testing, an extraordinary quality and complexity in
decision-making and other aspects of cognition. They seemed to have different
kinds of minds. They could find more solutions more quickly. They seemed not to
be driven by status. There was the dropping away of fear, which is perhaps the
most significant marker. Fear seemed to have vanished. Now caution didn’t, but
fear did. Tribal safety (PURPLE), raw power (RED), salvation for all eternity
(BLUE), individual success (ORANGE), and the need to be accepted (GREEN) all
diminished in importance. Instead there was a growing curiosity about just being
alive in the expansive universe.
WIE: The
dropping away of fear would certainly signify an enormous shift in human
consciousness and in the motivations that shape our human existence. Did Clare
Graves find any other indications of this approaching evolutionary transition?
DB: I
believe he had early evidence of minds that were becoming aware of the problems
we are facing today, long before these problems became visible to the rest of
us. He used to tell me that he felt that probably one in ten thousand brains is
produced with different biological features and frequencies. And those
individuals don’t conform to the norms of society because their minds are
already set for a different paradigm. He finally came to the conclusion that
something unique was happening here that didn’t appear to be just the next
step up from the GREEN level. It seemed to be a new category. Life Conditions
that would require this new thinking complexity that he observed three decades
ago have finally appeared on the scene. But his observations were way before the
microchip, before the end of the Cold War, and before the discovery of DNA and
molecular biology.
So Graves sensed that a
change of a profound nature was occurring, one that was beyond the sum total of
the first six memetic systems combined. Now that, of course, was a theory. But
as we look at the extraordinary complexity we are facing, this theory seems to
gain more and more credibility. Because now we can see the planet from the moon,
and now we have these wonderful scanning devices and satellites that can even
penetrate beneath surfaces, and for the first time we can begin to understand
the planet itself as a total ecosystem in a way that was never possible before.
Together with that, the world in which we now live is struggling with the
appearance of all of the memetic cultural expressions at once—ethnic tribes,
egocentric warlords, both dangerous and redemptive "isms," a whole
plateful of opportunists and materialists-in-the making, and a host of
postmodern egalitarian political, religious, and professional structures—oh
my, it makes a grown man want to weep. What do we do?
WIE: Right—that’s
the big question. How will the leap to Second Tier answer this question?
DB: At
this point, all of the old memetic systems have been weighed in the balance and
have been found wanting. While the full display of the YELLOW meme, the first
level of Second Tier, is years in the future, keep in mind that the ultimate
texture and capacity within this next memetic level must match and/or exceed the
complexity of the Life Conditions that it confronts. It must sense the big
picture and the interconnection of everything. So YELLOW will have an enhanced
vertical perspective with the ability to transcend and include and value
what came before, and also to anticipate what will be next.
I believe that the eighth meme
code—TURQUOISE—will rise in conjunction with the seventh, YELLOW. You could
think of YELLOW as "left brain with feelings" and TURQUOISE as
"right brain with data." TURQUOISE will focus on the larger waves and
energy flows and will work on behalf of the Life Force itself, in its many
manifestations in life-forms on the planet. The Second Tier thought structures
will combine elements of YELLOW and TURQUOISE in searching for the quality and
depth of thinking that can deal with complex problems. And with this is the
recognition that the whole spiral itself is spiritual and that we’re on this
upward ladder of human emergence. That’s spirituality.
But since memes are not
types of people but forms of adaptive intelligences in people,
YELLOW and TURQUOISE rarely exist in full measure in any person alive at this
time. Different people possess different fragments, or components, or even
versions, and this makes the formation of what I would call "creative brain
syndicates" with insightful interactions and dialogues even more important.
So it ought to engender some serious talk for the first time, and not just in
isolated conferences where everyone does their own thing. It’s going to
require some deep dialogue. And whether or not, once again, humans can rise to
the occasion is the existential question of the age.
My life flashed before my eyes. It didn’t
matter that I had given up the farm in Vermont, become a student of a spiritual
teacher, and joined a community of students who were genuinely dedicated to
spiritual transformation. My GREENness hadn’t gone anywhere. (Nor had the rest
of the First Tier memes, for that matter.) Terri, a friend, said to me one day,
"Jessica, you’ve been complaining about how we, as a group, are not
environmental enough, but just look back on your own life. Despite your
eco-image, you were consuming a lot more when you were living in Vermont than
you are now!" It was true: My Audi was sitting in the driveway. Shopping
sprees were infrequent. Living and working with many others, I was using less
electricity, oil, gas, and water. If I let my GREEN self-righteous
self-importance drop away for a minute, I had to admit that, objectively
speaking, I was actually more environmental than I had ever been in Vermont. How
illuminating, and ironic! And together with my long-held GREEN identity, all
sorts of other ideas and ideals were exposed, and the First Tier memes fell out
like a deck of cards.
In light of these new glimpses
from a higher perspective, I now realized I really had been at odds with myself.
My GREEN eco-consciousness was always in conflict with my ORANGE materialism. My
RED independence was in opposition to my GREEN need for acceptance and
communality, and the "Mean Green Meme" was hell-bent on pitting itself
against Second Tier, luring me with its righteous idealism and narcissistic
demands so I wouldn’t have to meet the evolutionary challenge to trust, let go
of fear, and actually transform.
Now, getting back to
enlightenment, well, as we’ve been finding, "Everybody wants to get
enlightened but nobody wants to change." But, to be honest, I didn’t
think that applied to me. I mean, I was spiritual. I was serious. I had made
sacrifices. But somewhere deep down, evolution was evolving my perspective and I
realized: Clare Graves was right, the leap to Second Tier is
"momentous," because it’s pointing to nothing less than the
difference between inner conflict and profound inner resolution between all the
parts of myself, all the memes. As Don Beck pointed out, it is the dropping away
of fear. And that’s no small thing. It means being completely at home in the
universe.
And in that shift in
perspective, I discovered more: the whole spiral is necessary. It’s what got
me to where I am today, and to the iota of humility required to recognize that I
really am part of the "never-ending upward quest" that Don Beck
describes. And this is only the beginning. Because freedom from fear and
irresolution means freedom to stand in awe of this miraculous, ever-ascending
spiral of human emergence. And freedom to stand in awe of the cosmic order that
creates it. As depths of insight and vast realms of consciousness glint from the
upper reaches of the spiral, the real possibilities begin.
*The concept of "meme" was first
proposed in the mid-1970s by the evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins, who
believed that the evolution of culture should be considered as independent from
genetic or biological evolution. Dawkins’ "memes" refer to specific
"units of cultural transmission," examples of which could be songs,
ideas, clothes fashions, to name just a few. However, in Spiral Dynamics, these
are called "little memes." When Beck uses the word "meme,"
he is speaking about a "core value system," or "value meme."
These act as "organizing principles" that express themselves through
little memes and that are so central to the way we think that they can
"reach across whole groups of people and entire cultures, and begin to
structure mindsets on their own."
**The "butterfly
effect" illustrates the essence of Chaos Theory. It is the notion that the
flapping of a butterfly’s wing will create a disturbance that, amplified by
the chaotic motion of the atmosphere, will eventually change large-scale weather
patterns, so that long-term behavior becomes impossible to forecast.
Excerpts and supporting
material used with author’s permission from Beck, Don E. and Cowan,
Christopher, Spiral Dynamics: Mastering Values, leadership and Change (Malden,
MA: Blackwell Inc., 1996); Beck, Don E., "The Search for Cohesion in the
Age of Fragmentation," (article written for the 1999 State of the World
Forum); Beck, Don and Linscott, Graham, The Crucible: Forging South
Africa’s Future (Denton, TX: New Paradigm Press, 1991). Richard Dawkins
quote on p. 111, from Dawkins, Richard, The Selfish Gene (Oxford
University Press, 1989), taken from the website, www.unblinkingeye.com;
Clare Graves quotes on pp. 124-125 from Graves, Clare, "Human Nature
Prepares for a Momentous Leap," The Futurist (1974); Ray Kurzweil
quote, pages 120-121, taken from the website, www.edge.org;
Elisabet Sahtouris quote, p.123, as told to WIE editor, Carter Phipps, Spring,
2002.
© Moksha Press, 2002. This
interview first appeared in the Fall/Winter 2002 issue of What Is
Enlightenment? magazine, entitled "Are You Ready To Change Now,"
and appears by permission of the publisher. For more information
about What Is Enlightenment? magazine, please visit www.wie.org.